On: Train Up a Child...

3:43 AM

Gifs via sridevi

Train up a child in the way he should go: and when he is old, he will not depart from it. - Proverbs 22: 6

Do you want to know where my eye goes to every single time a big name heterosexual male fffffinds* himself entangled in some lewd public scandal? Their female partner.

*I really hope you understood this reference.

Fun fact: I possess the superpower of drowning out most chaos. In the context of this post, the chaos I tend to halfheartedly observe surrounds the public response to an insert famous, scandalized straight male public figure name here's gross impropriety du jour. Rather than glomming my attention onto the male, I often find myself focusing a perceptive eye upon their (more often than not) female partner's presence.

Where before she was shrouded in a proverbial cone of silence, her figure will suddenly become matter of Great Public Importance and Prying Dissection™ - she  will become a household name faster than Beyoncé can break the internet.

Usually, this process occurs during a brand clean up, mea culpa tour; you know, some form of a Public Announcement of Contrition and A Promise to Do Better speech and/or press conference.*

*Some tears and/or bloodshot eyes, guaranteed.

Either way, their newfound public prominence will probably assist a paparrazo put their kid through college or help a journalist pay off their student loans.

They'll be the hottest thing on the block.

To clarify any confusions about my ensuing diatribe, I saw A Star is Born today. Where everyone around me was a melting puddle of tears by the end, I found myself distracted and withdrawn from the narrative - mind wandering in detached nonchalance and mild annoyance around the film's final 15 minute mark.

Though I had, to my credit, valiantly attempted to invest interest in the romantic relationship of the two protagonists, I had given up on any reason to root for their love approximately 40 minutes into the story.

I simply could not be bothered to care for yet another mea culpa kick off tour.

See, I have no longer found intrigue in witnessing a crumbling man work overtime to emotionally manipulate and shatter the world of his devotedly pristine, poised and unflinching woman.

I do not find marvel in watching a woman's victimhood suffocate and/or become overshadowed by her man's selfish behaviors.

Everyone was crying and I was mad.

So let's circle back to my original point: the often silent presence of the Stepford Wife to the aforementioned "big name male".

Those women have always served as a reminder of something I have ran from. Because standing there solemn-faced, nary a hair nor thread out of place as they personify absolutely unwavering support - is my worst nightmare.

The female partner who has done her duty and buried any perceptible emotion that is not Dutiful WAG™/Stepford Wife

The embodiment of one of my many romantic fears.

A living symbol of the shitty role I was, have been and will be expected to play within my own intimate relationships with men.

A fear which sits so heavy upon my chest and is jump started by one question:

Why must women always be the anchor?

You see, while watching the onscreen partnership of Jackson and Ally Maine - as brought to the big screen by Bradley Cooper and Lady Gaga, respectively - I found myself experiencing the same niggling feeling of harsh annoyance I had only previously felt towards a pre-"Everything is Love", Beyoncé and Jay-Z.

Where Jackson is given free reign to crumble and oh-so-publicly bring down their worlds, Ally is never afforded the same privilege. Her unflinching love and adoration for the man who stalked her plucked her out from under the arms of her father and an Edith Piaf moonlighting gig serving as a stimulus for forgiveness.

*Sigh*

A heterosexual love story.

A miser is born.

As a reminder, I do not know the characters, real selves nor relationship dynamic of Beyoncé and Jay-Z. We've all forgiven, sought therapy and moved forward as a Beyhive - hooray for being in a better place. 

To state, I did not strongly dislike the film. I actually enjoyed the music and, in fact, shall be leading both Willam and Shangela's campaigns for Best Supporting Actor(s). I am only posing this question after noticing a certain...pattern of expectation in the cinema I consume.

Though I am aware this is a remake of a remake...of a remake, which means I am not justifying nor excusing dated themes, rather I understand where they come from, this story was not fresh or new. Bradley Cooper's unintelligible accent be damned, if I wanted to watch a couple fall apart at the seams repaired mainly by the woman, I'd have gone on Twitter!

The story and characterizations of each individual in this particular cishet relationship mainly served as a reminder that large aspects of a very maddening reality remain so firmly rooted in society and are so pervasive as a result. It also reminded me that these characterizations are celebrated because nobody is beating Hollywood in perfecting the formula of pairing cliches with an emotional component meant to hit you squarely in the chest at JUST the right moment.

I'm not surprised, but I am a little wary at the response - especially when the themes shown are counterproductive to progress.

This wariness then led me to asking: Just WHEN will we see women putting their feet down?! When will we see a man tolerate the despicable behavior women are shown and expected to put up with?! And not as some sort of learning lesson wherein he STILL gets "Mrs. Right".

Are Huma Abedin, Deena Jones and Amy Dunne the only ones who played the game correctly?!

I've written about this before, and I will say it again: Women are the only ones taught to present the figure of poised, unflinching anchor in the name of love - even when that love is broken.

Trained up to become the never visibly worn doormats of those who have been trained up to take what they have been taught they are owed. No fear of consequence, public backlash or ceaseless, mindless critique hurled their way if they so much as smile too hard and form a wrinkle.

Why?

Gifs via sridevi

Historically, such has been presented as the revered, "socially acceptable" dynamic of power within heterosexual relationships. Veering anywhere off the dictated path of normalcy will result in mass waves of backlash, ignorance and truly avoidable stupidity.

Don't believe me? Look at the reaction to Kehlani's pregnancy.

Sure, times are changing, but sometimes it feels like we've moved 10 steps forward and taken 30 steps back. Which, ironically enough, does feel apropos as these past four years have felt like a sharp reversion towards base, American traditionalism. Although we claim growth, socially we have found ourselves pivoting right back to what we attempted to bury - to a mythos which remains pervasive in spite of all efforts and sometimes even as a result of it all.

Because that is what happens when you don't put your foot down and talk your sh*t - you backslide into a terrible place.

So there I sat in the theater - mad.

Mad at the astounding fragility of the male ego, the steadfast unwillingness to seek permanent help, the co-dependency, narcissism and, most importantly, yet another image of the selfish, mildly abusive husband and his wife - the strong, poised, almost pillar of salt.

The nursemaid to the child.

The dock by which he was told to tether his boat to in an attempt to live out the promise of a life of unchallenged happiness.

The little boy who was incapable of being the anchor his wife needed.

And despite her many attempts at 'saving' him, at holding him down - still he floated adrift and wayward.

And yet in spite of the many justifiable reasons to leave, the many red flags which went thoroughly ignored, there she stood at the dock - locked in place - his anchor, waiting for him through it all.

And yet despite it all and in spite of her own better judgement, it was not enough.

Very anti-Deena Jones.

I want to reiterate that Love: The Concept cannot be the only thing women are taught to cling upon when attempting to sustain and/or mend a fractured relationship. I had to learn the hard way, and now I'm reminding you, free of charge.

Reinforcing this message within any medium may very well be the vehicle upon which I drive myself off the cliff of madness.

I'm tired of being trained up to believe that, because I am a heterosexual woman, it is expected I stay locked in place by the side of, behind or even next to a man who is never expected nor required to do the same for me.

Who would sooner call me 'ugly' and abandon my side for toxic vices because his hurt is his, while my hurt is ours.

I am just so, so tired of that narrative.

I don't find it heart or gut wrenching or moving or emotionally stimulating - I find it disappointing and regressive - remake or not - it is not a revolutionary narrative.

It is a tale as old as time.

And I'm mad.

You Might Also Like

0 comments

Blog Archive